Giving the note: To Of The Nest he neither lacks reason nor remains him
When José Maria Del Nido speaks, nothing for calm. At this point, there is considered to be polemic any that one that pops in in the head office of the political correction to raise his voice over the rest, more direct and sincere. This must not be like that. The polemic is found by those who look for it, but also — and principally — those who, to find it, drift apart from the truth. It is not the case of the president of the Seville, which more looks like a father that a leader for the club of Nervion, since it takes care of it and goes out in his defense without thinking about anything more that in his shield and in his spear, about his war finery. And now, with good reason, it places his finger on Madrid, and there his criticism is directed.
Of the Nest it is infuriated by the of the capital press, and, true it is, he does not lack reasons it to be. Immediately after the supposed interest that the white set has deposited in Jesus Navas, it accuses his journalists of trying to destabilize the rivals of Real Madrid — it is necessary to remember that both face this Saturday — something that the lawyer does not consider to be chance, and that we all in certain way understand this way. In fact — we have already debated it — this attitude mediática (and I do not refer to the entity, although it has his blessing) has generated negative answers, up to the point of which even abroad this rejection species exists to the white club, to everything what from him comes. Finally, to his intentions, for being public and inopportunely revealed. What is if not the clause ‘antimadrid’.
Well, although the word is just of Of The Nest — that not for public it is necessary to repudiate, rather everything opposite — it is necessary to be more analytical with the question of the press, more self-critical also. It happens that to the being Marca and Expert the most well-read newspapers, his contents are most debated, in gatherings and in chats of bar, in the means and in the street. But it is necessary to differentiate two facts: one, the fact that there are means of national diffusion does not imply that they are equitable for with the whole territory; and two, other regions have newspapers of the same kind, which nevertheless are not considered to be nationals. I do not discover anything, it is clear, but we fall down in the confusion with naturalness.
Very probably you could buy the newspaper Sport in ‘his’ kiosk, although he lives in Seville; but do not be able to buy Sports Stadium if he lives in Catalonia (I imagine that). The reason is obvious, his diffusion depends on the number of followers of the team in question. Then, Mark and Grasp sound of Madrid, just as Sport or the original Sports World are of the Barca, or Sports Stadium of the Seville (let’s leave the Betis aside in these conclusions). In spite of everything, we remain pawned in considering Mark and Expert to be the big national sports newspapers, when this moves away from the reality. Although Expert is provided with regional editions, It does not mark, the sports colossus.
According to this vision, Mark (and Grasp) is the official religion and sects are the rest only. Perhaps the religion moves away from the kindness that it supports? No, gentlemen, forget the just journalism. Sport and Sports Stadium (ED), like examples, also try to destabilize his rivals. I remember that ED extracted to the light a few words of Javier Aguirre completely out of context. The Mexican made fun of the Seville in a holiday with Osasuna and the way made use of his malsonancia to place it in front along with a photo of the technician of that time of the Atleti, trying to defend itself this way and reinforce his attack against the press of Madrid, against which it was walking — and it walks — infuriated. This also is partial, and largely a bad journalism.
Although everything seems obvious, sometimes we obviate this reality. Another question is the responsibility with which they play the means. If Mark is the big sports newspaper of the country, his contents must be careful and more responsible than those of an extremely partisan newspaper. At least, he has to keep the forms. But, skylight, it is necessary to consider the potential client, and to do something that bothers the one that buys it, who for something does it. He does not lack reason to Of The Nest, but neither it remains him. There are so many examples, that that of Plain mountains is the only one more. It is possible that the player is of interest, but everything is so circumstantial that it sounds to strategy of the press, it departs from the care of his interests. That’s why it is right Of The Nest in speaking, but understand that this game destabilizes all of us. To me the first one.
Photo | Seville FC
