Interview or conspiracy?
To begin, we will throw a glance to the Wikipedia to know what a thing is and then other one.
He interviews: An interview is a fact that consists of a dialogue begun between two or more persons: the interviewer or interviewers who interrogate and or the interviewees who answer. An interview is not chance but it is an interested dialogue, with a previous agreement and a few interests and expectations in both parts. Also the interview can mean very much for other persons since persons of maximum importance can help to know.
Conspiracy: A conspiracy is a conspiracy or conspiracy of political or social character. Also it is defined as a conspiracy between two or more persons against other one or others.
Okay. Once we know, in major or less measured, both concepts, the play stays give and see what happened yesterday in the set of Four, where Florentino Pérez was invited, supposedly, be interviewed:
What sensations have you left? Interview or conspiracy? The true thing is that the participation of the white president in the section of sports of Four did not make anybody indifferent. On the web page of the chain, for example, the criticism joined towards Manu Carreño and Manolo Lama, two journalists who took charge of the spectacle, not very appropriately when when there talks each other of an informative one the place of meeting and not of a bar of bar.
Particularly, I did not like anything. The quintessence of the journalism got lost in exchange for accusations everywhere, signaling with the finger and absurd tests to which Florentine, who always supported the type, knew caracolear. In addition to videos with humiliating pretensions, questions and opinions of the people of the street that the only thing for that they were looking was that Pérez was losing the roles. And a servant, which can like the white president more or worse, can think about his correct or incorrect management, believes that the president Real Madrid supporter did not do it, it did not fall down in the provocation.
Because it is clear that there are great the means those that dance the water to Florentine. But also it is true that there are ways and ways it of trying to spoil. And the one that they chose, or it went out for them, to The manolos, it was not probably the most correct. Florentine saw, heard and he was quiet. Scarcely he could answer not at all before the alluvium of contempt of the interviewers, especially of a Mud that it rubbed the limit of the shamelessness.
This midday, in the informative one, they have apologized before the hearing. A detail to be born in mind because that thing about yesterday was a cheap cocktail between interview and conspiracy.
Bar Sports | The shameful interview of The manolos to Florentine
The Notebook of Van Gaal | good Manolo, bad Manolo
