On Guti, his followers and the Selection
I have to say first of all that I am an admirer and Guti defender. Of the faithful. And with believer I do not mean that he applauds him when it leaves his team with ten. I reproach myself it and this appellant comes to my mind theory of up to where it might have come with Raúl’s mentality. But neither I stop supporting him for one of his numeritos.
The people, fundamentally, usually appear of three ways towards ’14 of Real Madrid: those who always defend him although it commits a stupidity, which him always go on although for it they have to despise works of art like the Riazor taconazo, and those who love him or hate him depending on where the wind blows. I do not know you, but I from the last Saturday have seen to go out "gutistas" even of under the stones. Nevertheless it does not even one month, about Guti only one was speaking already to criticize him out for supposedly feigning injuries, to resign of the team, to come late to the trainings or the polemic of Alcorcón.
Since I have already said, I declare myself a big Guti admirer. Not only because ténicamente is one of the best players of the world, but because I like the players with character and that feel. Not for it I am going to defend him if it comes late to a training or if they expel him for a childishness, but I am not also going to set fire to him until it gives another taconazo. I even admit that I liked Guti in Alcorcón. In what it refers to soccer it failed as his partners, but at least it demonstrated that it him was hurting what it was spending. Before seeing the players of my team being walked like bogeys on a field of play to extract repeatedly of way with faded faces, I prefer to see a player as Guti “fighting” with your own partners, fighting with the players rivals and even facing up with the collegiate one. I am not going to say that it should be slightly model, but at least one is grateful to know that for these veins it covers blood and that it was shaming him that a second B was giving him such a drubbing.
As he was saying that earlier now it has turned the fashion “Guti“, but that will last until (let’s hope that it should not happen) it mounts one of theirs again. So much it has been so even in the press they have begun other of his umpteenth inflated debates: Guti selection? I believe that it is the most absurd debate since some illuminated one initiated of that Robben was better that Messi, only because it had chained three or four good parties. With Guti equal raisin. It has played one party and a half from his reappearance and more of the due thing loves already to extoll him, but we are not also going to ask for sanity a few gentlemen who leave it aside in exchange for selling newspapers.
We are speaking about our best selection of the history, which also is young and which precisely in the Guti position is where major potential hoards. What need is to retouched by what works? Why to put in a wardrobe in which the colegueo reigns to a watchmaker’s bomb? For fortune, Vicente Del Bosque is a sensible guy and, although as to me, him auction alfresco Guti, he knows that it is a derisory possibility to today. That chains at least half a period at the level that it demonstrated in his last two appearances. Then I will not hallucinate when this ridiculous debate is mounted.
