Soccer Fan Blog

Departing from the base of which the whole world has right to the freedom of expression, I believe that there is a person to whom lately it him is going away of the hands. I refer to Bernd Schuster. It is possible to agree or not in what he says, but I believe that basing on his past and his profession, he should begin thinking and to criticize with a major restraint.

It did not attract attention of me when it went out saying that Sergio Ramos one had to put the batteries. It was something clear. Neither when he said that it was a madness that Guti could go to the Selection. In fact it is something in what I agree with him. Nevertheless, with his declarations yesterday event in ‘The Tirachinas’ of the Chain Cope has passed of the streak.

That says that “without Christian, Real Madrid would be a pill to sleep” is something that, especially, attracts attention for whom he says it. Because Madrid of Schuster, in spite of gaining one League, was another team boredom. A trainer who supposedly came to reach the excellence and remained in little more than it had Capello: a set of good players who did not know what they were playing, but whose individual quality was reaching to win in Spain. Another thing was Europe.

But where Schuster is covered of glory it is with the following thing: "I had brought to Town. But there were many people who did not want that it was coming. From the team, even above, starting by the team and then above they began behind”. Declarations in clear allusion to Raúl, although when they ask him if it refers to him it does not have the value to admit it and shields itself in an illuminating and opportune cough. They does sound that thing about to throw the stone and to hide the hand?

What looks for Schuster with declarations like that? Does not he realize that it is missing to the respect to a club that it fed him? To players who defended him? To profession partners? It does a pair of months one was trying to note down somewhat with declarations of the type of “ordering to warm Raúl and then not to extract him it is a scorn. Enough is to be in the stool and this still gives him one more blow. It is necessary to take care of these details”. And then this? Is not it a scorn?

I do not enter if Raúl vetoed or did not veto the Town signing. But and if this way it was: where was it for Schuster of that time? Does it presume of that a player prevents from coming to the club a soccer player that he wanted? Does seem honorable to him to air things of the wardrobe?

I resemble the Schuster of Madrid. Every press conference was an anger. Embittered, with faded face, avoiding questions and always to the defensive. All this because he could not support the continuous criticism of the press. Nevertheless, look at him now, doing what so much he was criticizing. What will Pellegrini think?

Nice what is to speak with last time and to be kept silent when he should have spoken. It is not elegant at all to take advantage of a club to which one should be grateful, to do box giving holders of this type. That a thing is to think, to talk or to debate from the respect, and other one, and excuse the expression to me, to remove shit because yes. Only the resentment can explain declarations how are you.